Why the Greenland Dispute Is Shaking the EU–U.S. Partnership
What’s Happening?
In early 2026, tensions erupted between the United States and key European allies over Greenland — an autonomous territory of Denmark with strategic military and economic significance. U.S. President Donald Trump has reignited his long-standing ambition to acquire Greenland, claiming it is vital to U.S. national security. European governments, Denmark, and Greenland itself firmly rejected the idea that Greenland could be sold or transferred to the U.S..
Why This Matters
Greenland sits at a critical point in the Arctic — a region of growing geopolitical importance due to military positioning, climate change, and natural resources. Historically, the U.S. has maintained military presence there (e.g., at Pituffik Space Base), but any suggestion of territorial transfer alarms European governments and NATO allies.
How It Escalated
Rather than relying solely on diplomacy, President Trump responded to European opposition by threatening punitive tariffs on eight European countries (including Denmark, Germany, France, the UK, Sweden, Norway, Finland and the Netherlands) starting in February unless an agreement was reached over Greenland — a move European leaders widely criticized as economic coercion against allies.
European governments, in turn, have rejected the tariff threats and affirmed support for Denmark and Greenland, warning that such measures risk undermining the foundations of the transatlantic alliance.
The Partnership Under Strain
Traditionally, the EU and the U.S. have been bound by long-standing cooperation through NATO and shared democratic values. The Greenland dispute, however, highlights deepening rifts:
Sovereignty and international law: European leaders insist that Greenland’s status cannot be bargained away or dictated by a foreign power.
Economic confrontation: Tariff threats against allies jeopardize trade cooperation, including pending EU-U.S. trade agreements that were already under negotiation.
Security alliances in question: European officials warn that applying economic pressure within NATO can erode trust and even threaten alliance cohesion if disputes go unresolved.
Current Response
European leaders, from Ursula von der Leyen to national prime ministers, are coordinating a united diplomatic, economic and strategic response — committed to defending sovereignty, mitigating economic fallout, and keeping channels of dialogue open with Washington while resisting coercive tactics.
What This Means for the Transatlantic Relationship
The Greenland dispute has become more than a regional question: it is now a litmus test for the future of EU–U.S. relations. If allies cannot resolve this crisis through diplomacy, it could weaken cooperation on trade, security, and global challenges — fracturing a partnership that has endured for decades.
6 Comments